Public Knowledge wants the FCC to regulate broadband as a telecom service instead of an information service. The goal: to promote net neutrality. This seemingly innocuous change is a Trojan horse, opening the way for the agency to regulate the services that Internet providers must offer to all – a disincentive to innovation, and thus a bad deal for consumers.







FERC Order 436 and subsequent orders unbundled the gas pipeline industry, requiring pipelines to operate as open access transporters, and allowing customers to negotiate directly with gas suppliers. Most advocates of open markets thought this to be a good thing. Indeed, the pipeline network probably operates more efficiently than it did.
But now some of the same people who likely applauded pipeline open access (or do you prefer the old system of regulated bundled service?), tell us that we are creating a Trojan horse if we require telecommunications companies, which use public rights-of-way, public airwaves and the public’s powers of eminent domain, to provide open access transportation. I am a consumer. It does not seem to be a bad deal to me. Allowing those with control of the transportation path historically created through government and regulated entities to unfairly compete with its customers would seem to be the bad idea.